Tag: digital transformation

Posted on

The Future of Technology in Litigation Support: Why AI Is the New Brief Writer

As I, Moses Cowan, sit at my desk reviewing stacks of litigation documents, I’m struck by how fast the legal world is changing. What once required entire teams of paralegals now runs through software in minutes. The transformation I see is not just incremental. It feels like lightning rewiring the engine of litigation support. In this article, I explore how artificial intelligence (AI) — especially generative AI — is reshaping litigation support, why this change matters now, and where we might be heading next.

The rise of AI-powered litigation support solutions

In 2025, AI is no longer an experimental novelty in litigation support — it’s mainstream. According to a recent survey of over 2,800 legal professionals, 31% now use generative AI for work-related tasks. (Federal Bar Association) Meanwhile, about 42% of firms report using AI tools, and a similar share expect to increase that use in 2026. (U.S. Legal Support)

Common tasks handled by these AI-driven tools include document review, predictive analysis, summarizing transcripts, and helping craft litigation strategy. (U.S. Legal Support)
For busy legal teams, this can mean saving hours — even days — of repetitive work. (MyCase)

In short: AI is turning litigation support from a labor-intensive chore into a streamlined, tech-powered function.

Why AI now — the perfect storm in 2025

Several powerful forces have converged to accelerate AI adoption in litigation support this year:

  • Surging data volumes. With digital discovery, emails, messages, and digital evidence, the amount of data in modern cases can be overwhelming. A recent industry survey found that 80% of litigation departments expect their case portfolio to grow over the next 12–18 months — and many worry about how to manage exploding data loads. (NALA)
  • Pressure on efficiency and cost. Corporations and law firms feel pressure to deliver results faster and more cost-effectively. AI tools reduce time spent on laborious document processing and contract review. (LawSites)
  • Greater comfort with legal-specific AI. Large firms — those with 51 or more lawyers — now adopt generative AI at nearly double the rate of smaller firms. (MyCase)

What once felt like sci-fi — an AI summarizing thousands of documents — now feels like standard practice. For litigation support, 2025 may mark the turning point.

What AI brings to litigation support — speed, scale, insight

I think of AI as a “legal intern on steroids.” It never tires, doesn’t bill hourly, and can plow through thousands of pages in minutes.

  • Document review and summarization: AI can scan voluminous documents, flag relevant passages, and produce summaries. This dramatically reduces hours spent by staff on mundane tasks — freeing lawyers to strategize instead of scroll.
  • Predictive analysis & strategy support: For complex litigation, AI tools can identify patterns in prior case law, spot risk, and suggest plausible outcomes. These insights help shape case strategy early.
  • Transcripts and evidence synthesis: In multi-document, multi-witness cases, AI can quickly synthesize depositions, contracts, communications, and metadata — surfacing key threads that humans might miss under time pressure.
  • Cost control and resource allocation: By automating repetitive work, firms can reduce reliance on large support teams — and better allocate human talent for analysis, argument design, and client management.

In short, AI empowers litigation teams to operate with the speed and precision of a scalpel — rather than a blunt instrument.

Challenges: ethics, reliability, and human oversight

But AI in litigation support isn’t perfect. Much like a high-performance car that still needs a skilled driver, AI requires careful hands at the wheel.

  • Errors and “hallucinations”: AI tools can generate inaccurate summaries or misinterpret legal citations. That’s risky in litigation where precision matters. Legal professionals must vet AI-generated content carefully. (Business Law Today from ABA)
  • Ethical and regulatory concerns: Law firms remain cautious. Even though many attorneys use AI individually, firm-wide adoption lags. (Federal Bar Association)
  • Liability risks: As AI tools take a larger role, questions arise about who bears responsibility when AI makes a mistake. Could AI-enabled work create new liability exposures? (Weil)
  • Integration challenges: Legacy systems, document management protocols, and data privacy rules can slow or complicate AI deployment. (Clio)

Thus, while AI accelerates workflows, it must be anchored by human judgment, ethical standards, and rigorous oversight.

A story from the trenches: how I saw AI transform a messy discovery

Last spring, I reviewed a discovery set that ran over 10,000 documents. Dozens of depositions, emails spanning years, and multiple file formats. At first glance, it felt like digging a beach — layer after layer of sand, with no map.

Then I ran the files through an AI-powered litigation support engine. Overnight, the tool produced a 30-page summary. It flagged hundreds of key documents, grouped them by topic, and highlighted inconsistencies.

It was like going from sifting through a beach by hand to using a magnet to pull out every nail. Suddenly, the key evidence was visible. That day, I realized AI is not just a tool — it’s a spotlight in the chaos.

The ethical frontier: balancing innovation and responsibility

As AI-assisted litigation becomes more common, firms and lawyers must weigh speed against safety. The legal community is increasingly aware of the need for strong governance. (Business Law Today from ABA)

Adopting AI tools should come with firm-wide policies. Legal teams must vet outputs, verify citations, and guard against inaccuracy. The future of “AI-powered litigation support systems” depends not only on technology but on ethics, transparency, and accountability.

What’s next — toward AI-first litigation practices

If current trends continue:

  • More firms will adopt AI tools — not just for document review, but for litigation strategy, predictive analytics, and risk assessment.
  • AI may begin managing entire case workflows — from initial intake and evidence triage to drafting first-pass pleadings or briefs.
  • We’ll see hybrid teams: AI for grunt work, humans for judgment and persuasion. That combination may become the gold standard.
  • Ethical frameworks and compliance protocols will evolve alongside technology — perhaps even industry-wide standards for AI use in court filings.

Litigation support is transforming. The next wave will likely bring even greater speed, but only if we balance innovation with integrity.

Conclusion: why this tech evolution matters — and what to do

For practitioners and corporate legal departments alike, AI-powered litigation support is not a luxury anymore — it’s a necessity. As I have seen, AI can clear away mountains of data, reveal critical evidence, and give lawyers time to focus on strategy, not sorting.

But success depends on using these tools responsibly. Adopt AI, yes — but pair it with rigorous review, ethical awareness, and human judgment.

If you are a legal professional or firm leader, start asking: How might AI help us scale? What safeguards must we build? Where can we streamline work — and where must a human steer the course?

Call to action: I invite you to share your experiences or concerns with AI in litigation support. Comment below or reach out directly. Let’s build a conversation around the smart, ethical use of technology in law.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Can AI replace lawyers in litigation support?
A: No. AI excels at high-volume document processing, summarizing, and pattern recognition. But it lacks human reasoning, strategy, and ethical judgment. Lawyers remain essential, especially for analysis, case strategy, and persuasive advocacy.

Q: Is AI-generated work reliable enough for court filings?
A: Not yet — at least not without human oversight. AI can misstate facts, mis-cite authorities, or “hallucinate” content. All AI output should be reviewed and verified prior to submission.

Q: What types of cases benefit most from AI-powered support?
A: Complex cases involving large volumes of documents — mass torts, discovery-heavy litigation, multi-party class actions, regulatory investigations, or any case with large data sets. AI shines when scale and complexity overwhelm manual review.

Cowan Consulting, LC is a boutique professional services and consulting firm founded by Moses Cowan, Esq. Moses Cowan is a polymath and thought leader in law, business, technology, etc., dedicated to exploring innovative solutions that bridge the gap between business and cutting-edge advancements. Follow this blog @ www.cowanconsulting.com/WP for more insights into the evolving world of law, business, and technology. And, learn more about Moses Cowan, Esq.’s personal commitment to the communities in which he serves at www.mosescowan.com.

Posted on

The Future of AI-Powered Litigation Support Solutions and E-Business Engineering By Moses Cowan

Standing at a New Digital Crossroads

As I, Moses Cowan, look ahead into the evolving world of business and technology, I feel like a navigator on a sailboat caught between familiar shores and an open sea of breakthroughs. In the realm of e-business, information technology, and litigation support, one trending topic stands out today: the rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and its transformative effect on how companies operate, counsel and engineer solutions for tomorrow.

Across industries, businesses are racing to embed AI into their workflows. In 2024, 78 % of organizations reported using AI—up markedly from 55 % the previous year. In the online commerce sphere, global e-commerce sales are projected to reach $7.5 trillion in 2025 (up from $5.7 trillion in 2023). In short, we are not just evolving: we are pivoting.

In this article I explore how AI-driven tools are shaping the future of e-business, business engineering and litigation support, how we can harness them, and what challenges await. My metaphor: we are redesigning the engine of a classic car while driving it down the highway—exciting, risky, and full of opportunity.

Why AI-Driven Litigation Support Solutions Are Gaining Ground

Litigation support—a niche where law, business and technology collide—is getting a turbo-boost from AI. Firms are no longer relying only on human attorneys plus keyword search; they are now deploying AI-powered assistants that sift data, flag key documents, and even predict outcomes.

Consider this: generative AI drew $33.9 billion in global investments in one recent year, an increase of 18.7 % from the year before. This influx of capital underscores how AI is no longer peripheral—it is central. For litigation support, this means tasks once taking days or weeks can shrink to hours or minutes.

From my vantage as someone who has bridged law and business, I view this shift like upgrading from a manual transmission to a self-driving gearbox. You retain control, but the machine now handles the low-level operation and frees you for strategic maneuvers. Lawyers and consultants who adopt these tools become architects of outcomes, not just artisans of paperwork.

How the Future of Blockchain in E-Business Engineering Will Shape Systems

Beyond litigation support, business engineers are keeping a keen eye on another evolving frontier: blockchain and decentralized systems. While blockchain once flashed with cryptocurrency hype, today it is more quietly revolutionizing back-office processes, supply-chain traceability and smart contracts.

One recent academic review identified blockchain data analytics as under-explored in business intelligence contexts. For e-business engineers, this suggests fertile ground: designing blockchain-enabled platforms that reduce frictions, enhance auditability and create trust across parties.

Picture a contract platform that not only executes legal terms automatically, but also logs every amendment and triggers action based on even subtle shifts in data. For a consulting firm like mine, it’s as if the contract transforms from static document into live organism—monitoring, adapting and alerting when anomalies appear.

The Intersection of AI and E-Business: Designing Agile Systems

In the world of online commerce and e-business, AI is already deeply embedded. According to a recent inventory of trends, consumer behaviour, mobile adoption and immersive technologies are driving new models of engagement. And we know global internet users reached about 5.56 billion in early 2025—a 2.4 % year-on-year rise.

For e-business architects, the message is clear: build systems that evolve. AI-powered shopping agents, personalized recommendation engines and hyper-adaptive back-office workflows are not optional. They are now expected.

My own analogy: it’s like creating a city’s infrastructure with modular roads, flyovers and smart traffic lights rather than fixed lanes and stop signs. The business engineer must design for flow, flexibility and change, not just scale.

Practical Steps to Adopt AI-Powered Litigation Support & E-Business Strategies

Here are actionable guidelines I recommend based on my experience:

  1. Start with data hygiene
    Clean, labelled, well-governed data is the fuel for AI. Without it, even the best engine sputters.
  2. Pilot AI assistants for time-consuming tasks
    In litigation support, experiment with document review or prediction tools. In e-business, test recommendation engines or dynamic pricing models.
  3. Embed blockchain where trust and transparency matter
    Use blockchain-enabled contracts or supply-chain logs when multiple parties share frameworks and standards.
  4. Design for agility, not permanence
    Build architecture that allows plug-in of new models, new agents, and connects with APIs. Your system must be a ‘living’ platform, not a static warehouse.
  5. Address governance, ethics, and human oversight
    AI may get smarter, but you must remain in control of decisions that carry legal or reputational risk. The machine is the co-pilot, not the captain.

Challenges Ahead: Privacy, Regulation & Human Skills

Although the future is promising, I remain mindful of hurdles. AI in retail and commerce faces ethical scrutiny around transparency and bias. (arXiv) Skill gaps persist—many professionals are not ready for this shift. From a consulting standpoint, it’s like shifting to high-performance racing: you need the right driver, pit crew and rules board.

Regulation will also evolve. Consent, audit logs and accountability will become central to any AI-powered litigation support or e-business engineering solution. Planning ahead matters.

Conclusion: Embrace the Engine, Lead the Upgrade

In my work at Cowan Consulting LC, I see the future of technology applied to e-business, IT, business engineering and litigation support not as a distant horizon but as an urgent upgrade. We are at the point where AI-powered litigation support solutions, blockchain-driven business engineering platforms and agile e-business systems converge.

If you are ready to steer your firm or enterprise into this future, then now is the time to act. Reach out, pilot an AI project, design with modularity and vantage. Let us work together to build the engine that keeps you competitive, compliant and creative.

Call to action: If you’d like to explore how these technologies can be tailored to your organization or practice, let’s connect. Comment below or get in touch through my website, and let’s embark on the upgrade.

FAQ

Q1: How can small legal firms adopt AI-powered litigation support without huge budgets?
A 1: Start with cloud-based services rather than heavy infrastructure. Identify a high-impact sub-process (for example, document review) and pilot a solution. Then scale based on results.

Q2: In e-business engineering, when should one use blockchain rather than a traditional database?
A 2: Choose blockchain when you have multiple parties, require transparency, immutability or smart-contract automation. If you control the data and participants, a standard database may suffice.

Q3: What are the top risks when integrating AI into business engineering?
A 3: Major risks include unclean data, algorithmic bias, lack of human oversight, regulatory non-compliance and designing systems that are too rigid to change.

Cowan Consulting, LC is a boutique professional services and consulting firm founded by Moses Cowan, Esq. Moses Cowan is a polymath and thought leader in law, business, technology, etc., dedicated to exploring innovative solutions that bridge the gap between business and cutting-edge advancements. Follow this blog @ www.cowanconsulting.com/WP for more insights into the evolving world of law, business, and technology. And, learn more about Moses Cowan, Esq.’s personal commitment to the communities in which he serves at www.mosescowan.com.