The legal industry is crossing a quiet threshold.
Technology no longer sits beside legal work.
It is now embedded inside it.
As I, Moses Cowan, reflect on my own practice, I see a decisive shift.
Litigation support is no longer reactive or manual.
It is becoming predictive, automated, and continuously learning.
This article focuses on one category only.
Litigation support technology—specifically AI-powered litigation support solutions—is redefining how disputes are prepared, priced, and resolved.
Most technology trends chase consumer attention.
Litigation technology evolves out of necessity.
Courts are overloaded.
Discovery volumes are exploding.
Clients demand speed, transparency, and cost control.
In 2025, legal data is growing faster than legal headcount.
That imbalance created an opening for automation.
A recent industry snapshot shows over 72% of large U.S. firms now use AI-assisted review tools in active litigation matters.
Five years ago, that number was under 30%.
This is not hype.
It is survival math.
Modern litigation platforms do not “think” like lawyers.
They see patterns humans miss.
AI systems now assist with:
• Predictive document relevance scoring
• Early case outcome modeling
• Automated privilege detection
• Timeline reconstruction across data silos
• Cost forecasting before motions are filed
These tools do not replace judgment.
They sharpen it.
Think of AI as night-vision goggles for litigation teams.
You still choose the path.
You simply stop walking blind.
Years ago, litigation support meant warehouses and paralegal armies.
Discovery felt like mining with spoons.
I remember reviewing a dataset that looked manageable.
It was not.
Emails multiplied.
Attachments hid context.
Deadlines compressed.
When I later tested an AI-assisted review engine, the contrast was jarring.
The system flagged key custodians before I finished coffee.
That moment changed how I evaluate technology.
Not by novelty.
By leverage.
We are entering an era of litigation engineering.
Strategy now starts with models, not instincts.
AI platforms increasingly estimate:
• Likely motion success rates
• Settlement windows based on comparable cases
• Discovery cost curves by data source
• Risk exposure by jurisdiction and judge history
This is not replacing advocacy.
It is reframing it.
Litigation is becoming measurable.
And what becomes measurable becomes optimizable.
Cloud computing changed litigation first.
AI accelerated it.
Secure APIs now pull data from email, cloud storage, messaging platforms, and enterprise systems.
Everything becomes reviewable.
At the same time, encryption and zero-trust security models matured.
That removed adoption barriers.
Litigation support tools now operate like financial dashboards.
Live inputs.
Continuous recalculation.
The Internet is no longer just a research tool.
It is the litigation substrate.
Clients do not fear technology.
They fear uncertainty.
AI-powered litigation support reduces billing volatility.
That alone makes it transformative.
Predictive cost modeling allows teams to:
• Scope discovery before collection
• Decide which motions are economically rational
• Compare litigation versus settlement scenarios early
This shifts conversations from emotion to economics.
That is where real decisions happen.
Responsible deployment matters.
Firms now differentiate themselves by how they govern AI use.
Audit trails, bias controls, and explainability are no longer optional.
The best platforms show their work.
They explain why a document ranked high.
They allow human override.
Trust is becoming the premium feature.
The next phase is orchestration.
AI systems will soon coordinate entire litigation workflows.
From intake to trial prep.
Expect deeper integration with:
• Court e-filing systems
• Judge analytics platforms
• Expert witness databases
• Settlement optimization tools
Litigation support will become anticipatory.
Not just responsive.
Litigation reflects how society resolves conflict.
Efficiency here affects access to justice.
Lower discovery costs expand who can litigate.
Better forecasting reduces coercive settlements.
Technology does not make law softer.
It makes it clearer.
—
The legal profession stands at a turning point.Information now grows faster than any team can…
The most disruptive force in modern litigation is not a new statute or procedural rule.It…
As I, Moses Cowan, sit at my desk reviewing stacks of litigation documents, I’m struck…
As I, Moses Cowan, evaluate the shifting relationship between law and technology, one theme stands…
When I look back over my career—first as a lawyer, then as a professor, engineer,…
Standing at a New Digital Crossroads As I, Moses Cowan, look ahead into the evolving…